| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/11/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/11/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de; MARQUES, F. A.; SILVA, K. E. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSE COELHO DE ARAUJO FILHO, CNPS; FLAVIO ADRIANO MARQUES, CNPS; KAROLINA ESTHER DA SILVA, UFRPE. |
|
Título: |
Great groups of soils of the Northeast of Brazil not yet cataloged in the Brazilian System of Soil Classification. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS OF SOIL SCIENCE, 21., 2018, Rio de Janeiro. Soil science: beyond food and fuel: proceedings... Viçosa, MG: SBCS, 2019. v. 2, p. 57. WCSS 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this work is to present taxonomic information on soil great groups not yet cataloged in the SiBCS. |
|
Thesagro: |
Classificação do Solo; Solo Tropical; Taxonomia. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Soil classification; Soil taxonomy; Tropical soils. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/205485/1/Great-groups-of-soils-of-the-Northeast-of-Brazil-not-yet-cataloged-in-the-Brazilian-System-of-Soil-Classification-2019.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00888nam a2200205 a 4500
001 2115133
005 2019-11-27
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de
245 $aGreat groups of soils of the Northeast of Brazil not yet cataloged in the Brazilian System of Soil Classification.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS OF SOIL SCIENCE, 21., 2018, Rio de Janeiro. Soil science: beyond food and fuel: proceedings... Viçosa, MG: SBCS, 2019. v. 2, p. 57. WCSS 2018.$c2018
520 $aThe objective of this work is to present taxonomic information on soil great groups not yet cataloged in the SiBCS.
650 $aSoil classification
650 $aSoil taxonomy
650 $aTropical soils
650 $aClassificação do Solo
650 $aSolo Tropical
650 $aTaxonomia
700 1 $aMARQUES, F. A.
700 1 $aSILVA, K. E. da
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
JIMÉNEZ, J. -J.; DECAENS, T. |
|
Título: |
Species co-occurrence and spatial pattern of earthworm community related to soil heterogeneity in a Neotropical gallery forest. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Competitive interactions and environmental factors act as filters and both determine community
assembly at different scales. The description of species co-occurrence patterns through relevant
null-model analysis has been seldom addressed for soil animals in the scientific literature. In
this study, we assessed the spatial distributional features of an earthworm community and
selected soil properties in a gallery forest of the Colombian ?Llanos?. Non-parametric statistical
tools, namely Spatial Analysis Distance IndicEs (SADIE), Null-model (Co-occurrence) analysis,
and Partial Mantel test combined with multivariate analyses (correspondence and Co-Inertia
analyses) were used. Our hypotheses were: i) species of the gallery forest co-occur at shortscale
by occupying different areas of varying physico-chemical properties, and ii) the species
co-occurrence pattern is not structured by competition.
At the local scale of our study (tens of meters) earthworm species co-occurred more frequently
than expected by chance (EBC), and the C-score was significantly different to the observed
value only for one algorithm (fixed-proportional). The SADIE analyses confirmed the presence
of small patches and gaps of varying size. The number of clusters (i.e. patches or gaps) ranged
from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 7. SADIE analysis also confirmed the randomness pattern
of the spatial distribution of species. A significant species association and dissociation was
observed for different pair of species.
The Co-Inertia analysis showed the correlation between earthworms and soil variables, and the
Partial Mantel test revealed which soil variable was significantly linked to the spatial distribution
of species, which seemed to be species-specific. Compared to other studies conducted in the
area, and where a clear opposite spatial pattern was detected for two species, there was no
significant spatial exclusion in the gallery forest. This might be an indication of no resource use
limitation in this ecosystem, although this hypothesis needs to be tested further. In conclusion
the earthworm community of the gallery forest was not structured by interspecific competition,
although species showed a patchy distribution in space. MenosCompetitive interactions and environmental factors act as filters and both determine community
assembly at different scales. The description of species co-occurrence patterns through relevant
null-model analysis has been seldom addressed for soil animals in the scientific literature. In
this study, we assessed the spatial distributional features of an earthworm community and
selected soil properties in a gallery forest of the Colombian ?Llanos?. Non-parametric statistical
tools, namely Spatial Analysis Distance IndicEs (SADIE), Null-model (Co-occurrence) analysis,
and Partial Mantel test combined with multivariate analyses (correspondence and Co-Inertia
analyses) were used. Our hypotheses were: i) species of the gallery forest co-occur at shortscale
by occupying different areas of varying physico-chemical properties, and ii) the species
co-occurrence pattern is not structured by competition.
At the local scale of our study (tens of meters) earthworm species co-occurred more frequently
than expected by chance (EBC), and the C-score was significantly different to the observed
value only for one algorithm (fixed-proportional). The SADIE analyses confirmed the presence
of small patches and gaps of varying size. The number of clusters (i.e. patches or gaps) ranged
from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 7. SADIE analysis also confirmed the randomness pattern
of the spatial distribution of species. A significant species association and dissociation was
observed for different pair of s... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02932naa a2200133 a 4500
001 1314945
005 2008-09-25
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aJIMÉNEZ, J. -J.
245 $aSpecies co-occurrence and spatial pattern of earthworm community related to soil heterogeneity in a Neotropical gallery forest.
260 $c2008
520 $aCompetitive interactions and environmental factors act as filters and both determine community assembly at different scales. The description of species co-occurrence patterns through relevant null-model analysis has been seldom addressed for soil animals in the scientific literature. In this study, we assessed the spatial distributional features of an earthworm community and selected soil properties in a gallery forest of the Colombian ?Llanos?. Non-parametric statistical tools, namely Spatial Analysis Distance IndicEs (SADIE), Null-model (Co-occurrence) analysis, and Partial Mantel test combined with multivariate analyses (correspondence and Co-Inertia analyses) were used. Our hypotheses were: i) species of the gallery forest co-occur at shortscale by occupying different areas of varying physico-chemical properties, and ii) the species co-occurrence pattern is not structured by competition. At the local scale of our study (tens of meters) earthworm species co-occurred more frequently than expected by chance (EBC), and the C-score was significantly different to the observed value only for one algorithm (fixed-proportional). The SADIE analyses confirmed the presence of small patches and gaps of varying size. The number of clusters (i.e. patches or gaps) ranged from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 7. SADIE analysis also confirmed the randomness pattern of the spatial distribution of species. A significant species association and dissociation was observed for different pair of species. The Co-Inertia analysis showed the correlation between earthworms and soil variables, and the Partial Mantel test revealed which soil variable was significantly linked to the spatial distribution of species, which seemed to be species-specific. Compared to other studies conducted in the area, and where a clear opposite spatial pattern was detected for two species, there was no significant spatial exclusion in the gallery forest. This might be an indication of no resource use limitation in this ecosystem, although this hypothesis needs to be tested further. In conclusion the earthworm community of the gallery forest was not structured by interspecific competition, although species showed a patchy distribution in space.
700 1 $aDECAENS, T.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Rondônia... Mostrar Todas |
|
Identificador: |
2826 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Código do título: |
0900592 |
|
ISSN: |
0100-6967 |
|
Código CCN: |
027582-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
DIVULGACAO AGRONOMICA |
|
Entidade: |
Shell Quimica S.A. |
|
Local de publicação: |
Sao Paulo-SP |
|
Periodicidade: |
irregular |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1959 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Algodão
1961/79 (3,5-9,11,13,14-19,21-46)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Amapá
1966 (22); 1969 (27); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1975 (36); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (46)
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental
1959 (1); 1960 (2); 1961 (3-4); 1962 (5-8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05D518
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão
1960 (1); 1962 (6); 1963 (10); 1964 (12-13,15); 1965 (16-17); 1966 (19,22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-40); 1977 (42); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45)
Embrapa Cerrados
1959-60 (1-2); 1961 (4); 1962 (6); 1964 (11); 1965; 1966 (18-22); 1968 (24,26); 1969 (27); 1970-80 (28-47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura
1960(1-2); 1961(3-4); 1962(5-8); 1963(9-10); 1964(11-13); 1965(14-17); 1966(18-22); 1967(23); 1968(24-26); 1969(27); 1970(28-29); 1971(30-31); 1972(32); 1973(33); 1974(34-35); 1975(36-37); 1976(38-41); 1977(42); 1978(43-44); 1979(45-46); 1980(47);
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1961 (4); 1964 (12); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-21); 1967 (23); 1968/78 (25-44); 1979 (45)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Pantanal
1971-80 (30,33,38-40,42-47)
Classificação: 23A
Embrapa Rondônia
1967 (23); 1969-71 (27-30); 1973-74 33-35; 1976 (39); 1978 (43-44); 1979-80 (45-47);
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Semiárido
1960 (2); 1961 (1,3); 1962 (7-8); 1965 (14-16); 1966 (20); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (39-41); 1978 (43-44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47);
Embrapa Soja
1965 (17); 1966(20); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34-35); 1975 (36-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978(43-44); 1979 (46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Trigo
1960/80 (1-2) 1960; (3-4) 1961; (5-8) 1962; (9-10) 1963; (11-13) 1964; (15-16) 1965; (18-22) 1966; (23) 1967; (24-26) 1968; (27) 1969; (28-29) 1970; (30-31) 1971; (32) 1972; (33) 1973; (34-35) 1974; (36-37) 1975; (38-41) 1976; (42) 1977; (43-44) 1978; (45-46) 1979; (47) 1980.
Classificação: 632.05
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
1961 (1); 1962 (8); 1963 (10); 1964 (11-13); 1965 (14-17); 1966 (18-22); 1967 (23); 1968 (24-26); 1969 (27); 1970 (28-29); 1971 (30-31); 1972 (32); 1973 (33); 1974 (34); 1975 (35-37); 1976 (38-41); 1977 (42); 1978 (44); 1979 (45-46); 1980 (47)
Classificação: 632.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
